Problems with radiometric dating of rocks kezia noble dating

Posted by / 01-Feb-2018 20:50

Problems with radiometric dating of rocks

This article appears on the American Scientific Affiliation website. For best viewing of the entire article, please click here (opens a new browser window).

This page is large (376 KB) so please allow a minute to load on a dial-up connection.

The rejection of the validity of fossils and of dating by religious fundamentalists creates a problem for them: Fossil sequences were recognized and established in their broad outlines long before Charles Darwin had even thought of evolution.

Early geologists, in the 1700s and 1800s, noticed how fossils seemed to occur in sequences: certain assemblages of fossils were always found below other assemblages. Since 1859, paleontologists, or fossil experts, have searched the world for fossils.

Most people accept the current old-earth (OE) age estimate of around 4.6 billion years.

This age is obtained from radiometric dating and is assumed by evolutionists to provide a sufficiently long time-frame for Darwinian evolution.

And OE Christians (theistic evolutionists) see no problem with this dating whilst still accepting biblical creation, see Radiometric Dating - A Christian Perspective.

" This article addresses that question, which represents the thinking of a large number of people today.

Certainly the majority of scientists accept radiometric dating.

problems with radiometric dating of rocks-58problems with radiometric dating of rocks-59problems with radiometric dating of rocks-89

These skeptics do not provide scientific evidence for their views.

One thought on “problems with radiometric dating of rocks”

  1. want to leave your personal footprint on the wholesale business? see yourself actively shaping the success of our customers and their businesses? see your ideas being implemented on a global scale, throughout several countries?